×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Draft US 101 South County Multimodal Strategy

The TA is accepting Working Group member comments from December 1st to December 8th, 2025

The San Mateo County Transportation Authority (TA) has prepared the draft US 101 South County Multimodal Strategy which identifies projects that best meet the needs for all types of transportation options. The South County strategy includes the cities of Atherton, East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, North Fair Oaks, and Redwood City. The project includes a one-mile study area along both sides of the corridor to identify projects that can be considered for inclusion in the funding strategy.

Below, you can view the draft US 101 South County Multimodal Strategy and provide input. This strategy aims to improve the way people and goods move through the South County portion of the corridor. It includes an introduction to the 101 Corridor Connect program, analysis of existing conditions, summary of the stakeholder and community outreach that was conducted, project identification and scoring methodology, and the final list of priority projects for South County.

Share your feedback!

Review the draft US 101 South County Multimodal Strategy and provide your feedback by clicking anywhere in the document to provide comments, suggested changes, or questions about the plan:

Use the scroll bar on the right side, or click the "Drag" option in the top toolbar to navigate from page to page.
Click "Comment" in the top toolbar, then click anywhere on the document page to leave feedback. You will be asked to enter your name and email address to submit a comment.

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Powered by Konveio

Comments

Cancel

Add comment

Kristiann Dec 5 2025 at 5:47PM on page 69

Can we put Menlo Park first since most of the project is in Menlo Park?

Robert Dec 5 2025 at 4:54PM on page 80

Question

Class I bike and ped?

Robert Dec 5 2025 at 4:52PM on page 76

Suggestion

$2-3 Million

Robert Dec 5 2025 at 4:50PM on page 66

Suggestion

$2-3 Million

Robert Dec 5 2025 at 4:48PM on page 48

Suggestion

portions of Marsh lack pedestrian infrastructure as well.

Robert Dec 5 2025 at 4:46PM on page 22

Suggestion

Portions of bike lanes on Middlefield Road have buffers. Should update map.

Robert Dec 5 2025 at 4:45PM on page 22

Suggestion

Lange segment of bike lanes on Valparaiso have buffers. Should update map.

Robert Dec 5 2025 at 4:42PM on page 21

Question

Atherton?

Robert Dec 5 2025 at 4:42PM on page 21

Question

Confirm terminus of bike lanes on Middlefield Road. Class II/IIb lanes between Oak Grove and Encina Avenue in Atherton

Batool Zaro Dec 5 2025 at 11:55AM on page 58

Suggestion

The project limit on the project image needs to be slightly adjusted to reflect the actual project limit (as it doesn't include all on University Avenue).

Batool Zaro Dec 5 2025 at 11:53AM on page 58

Suggestion

Can we remove the bike lane reference under the schedule?

Batool Zaro Dec 5 2025 at 11:51AM on page 58

Suggestion

The location needs to be updated; the limit is University Avenue from Kavanaugh Drive to Donohoe Street

Batool Zaro Dec 5 2025 at 11:49AM on page 51

Suggestion

Minor correction, but it's "O'Connor Street*"

Joanna Chan Dec 4 2025 at 10:47PM on page 51

Question

Table 15 above identified 3 projects in Menlo Park. Please advise where the 3rd one is.

Nicholas Yee Dec 3 2025 at 2:53PM on page 81

Suggestion

Rename to "Reimagine Dumbarton"

Nicholas Yee Dec 3 2025 at 2:52PM on page 75

Suggestion

Confirm if this amount or $30m

Nicholas Yee Dec 3 2025 at 2:52PM on page 75

Suggestion

Rename to "Reimagine Dumbarton"

Nicholas Yee Dec 3 2025 at 2:50PM on page 67

Suggestion

As mentioned before, all "Dumbarton West Connector" text should be "Reimagine Dumbarton" as that's the new name of the project.

Nicholas Yee Dec 3 2025 at 2:46PM on page 52

Suggestion

Is this supposed to be $30m?

Nicholas Yee Dec 3 2025 at 11:55AM on page 51

Suggestion

Please change all references of "Dumbarton West Connector" to "Reimagine Dumbarton". The project was recently renamed a couple weeks ago

Nicholas Yee Dec 3 2025 at 11:08AM on page 19

Suggestion

Midpoint isn't a Menlo Park shuttle. And these numbers seems way too low, depending on how you're counting it. Menlo Park manages four shuttles: Marsh, Willow, Crosstown, Shoppers

Nicholas Yee Dec 3 2025 at 11:04AM on page 18

Suggestion

Menlo Park Crosstown Shuttle is missing from this map. And it's hard to show, but Willow Rd actually hosts the Menlo Park Crosstown, Menlo Park Willow Shuttle, DBX, SamTrans 296 so it is a pretty heavy transit corridor that might be worth highlighting

Gwen Buckley Dec 2 2025 at 1:18PM on page 26

Suggestion

What are the census blocks in brown? Does that mean both MTC and Samtrans equity areas? Suggest adding to legend.

Gwen Buckley Dec 2 2025 at 1:13PM on page 57

Suggestion

I know we provided this language but suggest some minor edits so it reads:
"The project relocates the Redwood City Transit Center one block to the north and expands it from a two-track station to an elevated four-track station. A four-track station in Redwood City is required for Caltrain to implement its Service Vision of 8 trains per peak hour per direction. The project also includes grade separation at six of the existing at-grade crossings. "

Gwen Buckley Dec 2 2025 at 12:57PM on page 57

Suggestion

Can we pluralize this? (i.e. Grade Separations)

Gwen Buckley Dec 2 2025 at 12:56PM on page 57

Suggestion

Instead of "Redwood City transit center relocation", I would say something like "Redwood City transit center expansion" since the key purpose of the project is to expand the station from two tracks to four tracks to accommodate a higher level of service.